“What further need have we of witnesses?”
The full verse · Matthew 26:65 · KJV
the high , , He hath spoken ; have of ? , ye have .
Asked by
Caiaphas: the high priest, who rent his clothes when Jesus answered his oath (Matthew 26:63-65)
Asked to
Sanhedrin: the council of chief priests, elders, and scribes gathered at Caiaphas' palace, who had sought false witness to put Jesus to death (Matthew 26:57, 59)
The Scene
Under oath, Jesus has just answered the high priest, "Thou hast said," and added that they would see the Son of man "sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven" (Matthew 26:63-64).
Why It Was Asked
The purpose behind the questionCaiaphas believed he finally had what the witnesses could not give him. Jesus had owned, under oath, that He is the Christ, and had spoken of sitting at the right hand of power (Matthew 26:64). Barnes states the charge this way: "he has, under oath, arrogated to himself what belongs to God." The question was not looking for information. It announced that the search for witnesses was over, because the whole council had heard Jesus for themselves.
The Response
What Scripture recordsCaiaphas answered his own question in the same breath: "behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy" (Matthew 26:65). He then put the matter to the council, "What think ye?" and they answered, "He is guilty of death" (Matthew 26:66). Mark records the same question, "What need we any further witnesses?" (Mark 14:63). In Luke the council says, "we ourselves have heard of his own mouth" (Luke 22:71).
Historical Context
The world behind the wordsTearing one's clothes was a sign of grief. Barnes writes, "The Jews were accustomed to rend their clothes, as a token of grief." The Law told the high priest not to "rend his clothes" (Leviticus 21:10), but Gill explains that this law concerned only the rending of garments at funerals, in mourning for the dead. Barnes reads it differently: the prohibition probably meant the robes of his priestly office, and the garment Caiaphas tore was probably his ordinary one. On hearing blasphemy, Gill says, everyone, the high priest included, "was obliged to rend his garments."
The Greek eblasphēmēsen means "he has blasphemed." Under the Law, the one who blasphemed the name of the LORD was to be stoned (Leviticus 24:16).
The Bigger Picture
Where this fits in God's storyThis question shows how the council judged Jesus. Matthew records no attempt to weigh whether His claim might be true. The moment He said who He was, the claim itself became the crime (Matthew 26:65). Gill says Caiaphas tore his clothes "to show his zeal for the honour and glory of God," yet he was condemning the very Son of God.
Jesus' words reached past that courtroom. The men sitting in judgment would one day "see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power" (Matthew 26:64). The One they called a blasphemer was telling them the truth about Himself.
Look Closer
Why did Caiaphas say no more witnesses were needed?
Carry the question into prayer and conversation.
Lord Jesus, where have I closed the case on something You said about Yourself, and what would it look like to listen to You again?
A prayer to carry into the day.
- Caiaphas decided he had heard enough. What makes it hard for you to keep listening when Jesus says something that unsettles you?
- Tell about a time your view of Jesus changed after you paid closer attention to what He actually said.
For you, a small group, a friend, or the dinner table.
It is possible to hear Jesus clearly and still refuse Him. The council heard His words "of his own mouth" (Luke 22:71) and called them blasphemy. Hearing is not the same as receiving.
When a claim of Jesus unsettles you, slow down before you close the case. Bring it to Him and to the Scriptures. This doesn't mean every question must stay open forever. It means letting His words be weighed honestly, not dismissed because of what they would cost you.
Built from the biblical text and checked against trusted commentaries and lexicons. References & Sources
Keep questioning
“What need we any further witnesses?”
“What need we any further witness?”
“What think ye?”
“Answerest thou nothing? What is it which these witness against thee?”