“Doth God take care for oxen?”
The full verse · 1 Corinthians 9:9 · KJV
it is the of , Thou the mouth of the that treadeth out the . take for ?
Asked by
Paul: the apostle who founded the church at Corinth, appealing to the law of Moses for his right to support (1 Corinthians 9:8-9)
Asked to
Corinthians: the church at Corinth, "the seal of mine apostleship" (1 Corinthians 9:2)
The Scene
Paul quotes the law of Moses, "Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn" (1 Corinthians 9:9; Deuteronomy 25:4), to show that the law backs his right to be supported.
Why It Was Asked
The purpose behind the questionPaul wants the Corinthians to look past the ox to the purpose behind the law. His question does not deny that God cares for animals. Gill answers Paul's question, "yes, he does," but adds, "not for them only, nor principally, but chiefly for men," and on the next verse he applies the law particularly to ministers of the Gospel. Barnes, on Paul's next words "altogether for our sakes" (1 Corinthians 9:10), says "altogether" "cannot mean that this was the 'sole' and 'only' design of the law." The question presses toward the larger lesson: if God provides for a working ox, He surely means for working people to be provided for.
The Response
What Scripture recordsPaul answers with a second question and then a plain statement: "Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope" (1 Corinthians 9:10). The law was written with people in view too. Those who labor should work in hope of sharing in what their work produces.
Historical Context
The world behind the wordsAt harvest, grain was spread on a threshing floor and oxen were driven over it to separate the grain from the husk. Gill describes how "The oxen were led to and fro upon them, drawing this threshing instrument after them." Barnes defines "muzzle" with Webster's words: "to bind the mouth; to fasten the mouth to prevent eating or biting" (Webster, quoted by Barnes). So the law let the ox eat while it worked. Gill also reports that Jarchi, a Jewish commentator, said the ox is mentioned "to express man" (Jarchi, quoted by Gill). The Greek behind "take care" is melei, "is there care" or "is concerned."
The Bigger Picture
Where this fits in God's storyThis question opens a window on God's law. A small rule about animals at harvest reveals a God who notices the hungry ox and who cares even more for the people who labor. Scripture says, "O LORD, thou preservest man and beast" (Psalm 36:6), and "He giveth to the beast his food" (Psalm 147:9). Jesus reasons the same way about the birds God feeds: "Are ye not much better than they?" (Matthew 6:26).
Barnes says Paul's point is "To show that the laws and requirements of God are humane, kind, and equitable." Paul is not throwing away the plain meaning of Deuteronomy 25:4. He is drawing out the heart behind it, and he uses the same law again for elders who labor in the word (1 Timothy 5:17-18).
Look Closer
Does Paul's question mean God does not care about animals?
Carry the question into prayer and conversation.
Father, You notice even a working ox; where in my daily work do I need to trust that You see me?
A prayer to carry into the day.
- What does a law about feeding oxen tell you about the kind of God who gave it?
- Tell about a time when you saw God provide for you or someone else in an ordinary, everyday way.
For you, a small group, a friend, or the dinner table.
God's care reaches into ordinary things: harvests, animals, wages. If He wrote a law to protect a hungry ox, you can trust that He sees your labor too.
This question also asks how you treat those who work for you or serve you. Do they share in what their work produces? Paul applies the law first to those who preach the gospel (1 Corinthians 9:11, 14), and again to elders: "Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward" (1 Timothy 5:18).
This doesn't mean the law was only a picture. It meant what it said, and Scripture still teaches that "A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast" (Proverbs 12:10). Scripture's own application: 1 Timothy 5:17-18
Built from the biblical text and checked against trusted commentaries and lexicons. References & Sources
Keep questioning
“Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? Who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? Or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock?”
“Say I these things as a man? Or saith not the law the same also?”
“If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?”
“If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather?”